MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2331181690 · doi:10.2749/222137810796024015

Exploring Issues of Aesthetics in a Railway Environment: the Infrastructure of Stratford City, London

2010· article· en· W2331181690 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueReport · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicUrban Design and Spatial Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRedevelopmentQuarter (Canadian coin)Transport engineeringQuality (philosophy)Architectural engineeringEngineeringCivil engineeringBusinessGeographyArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

<p>Stratford, in the east of London, is undergoing major redevelopment to become the main venue for the 2012 Olympic and Paralympic Games and to create Stratford City: a 73-hectare mixed-use new city quarter including retail, residential and commercial uses.</p><p>The area includes multiple railway lines providing local, national and international passenger and 24-hour freight services. There are rigorous planning controls to create high quality new infrastructure combined with strict rail safety and approval requirements.</p><p>Engineering criteria vary considerably across the site and between different bridges and structures. The design of the bridges and structures covered in the paper reflects their diverse engineering requirements while the architectural appearance of them shows a high aesthetic quality and a coordinated family resemblance, based on the careful use of pattern and materials.</p>

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.049
Threshold uncertainty score0.228

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.185 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it