Engineering Homologous Molecular Organization in 2D and 3D. Cocrystallization of Pyridyl-Substituted Diaminotriazines with Alkanecarboxylic Acids
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Isomeric pyridyl-substituted diaminotriazines 2a – c and elongated analogue 3 are designed to adopt flattened structures with features that favor adsorption on surfaces and participation in multiple intermolecular interactions. In particular, pyridyl and diaminotriazinyl groups have strong affinities for graphite, and both form coplanar hydrogen-bonded adducts with alkanecarboxylic acids according to reliable motifs. Together, these properties predispose compounds 2a – c and 3 to be coadsorbed with alkanecarboxylic acids on graphite and to cocrystallize as structures built from hydrogen-bonded sheets. Comparison of the 2D structures of the ordered adlayers (as determined by scanning tunneling microscopy) with the 3D structures of the cocrystals (as determined by X-ray diffraction) showed striking homology, typically with quantitatively similar structural parameters. Together, these results illustrate how a series of related compounds can be engineered to form ordered adlayers and crystalline solids with closely analogous 2D and 3D structures. Specifically, the molecular components should have an affinity for the underlying surface and should engage in coplanar interactions that are strong relative to the energy of adsorption, thereby ensuring that the components are positioned reliably in sheets despite the effect of the surface. In general, compounds with these features should favor similar organization in different states, including monolayers, thin films, and bulk materials, and they promise to be useful in applications requiring behavior that depends predictably on dimensions, such as in thin-film molecular devices.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".