MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2331258592 · doi:10.1061/41173(414)17

Multi-Objective Design Optimization of Branched Pipeline Systems: Analytical Probabilistic Assessment of Fire Flow Failure

2011· article· en· W2331258592 on OpenAlexaff
BongSeog Jung, Yves Filion, Barry J. Adams, Bryan Karney

Bibliographic record

VenueWorld Environmental and Water Resources Congress 2011 · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicWater Systems and Optimization
Canadian institutionsQueen's UniversityUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSortingProbabilistic logicMathematical optimizationFlow (mathematics)Multi-objective optimizationPareto principleComputer scienceProbability distributionPipeline (software)EngineeringMathematicsAlgorithmArtificial intelligenceStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper develops a multi-objective optimization approach that incorporates the probability of fire flow failure in branched water distribution networks. An analytical probabilistic model is developed to quantify the probability of fire flow failure in branched networks and incorporated into the non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm (NSGA-II). The optimization approach seeks to minimize two conflicting objectives: capital cost and the probability of fire flow failure. Capital cost and fire flow failure probability are balanced through the selection of the pipe diameters and the number of pumps in the system. The probability of hydraulic failure under fire flow conditions is solved analytically in a branched network. The non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm is used to produce a set of Pareto-optimal solutions in the objective space of pipe and pump cost and fire flow failure probability.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.368
Threshold uncertainty score0.595

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.190
Teacher spread0.175 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueWorld Environmental and Water Resources Congress 2011Same topicWater Systems and OptimizationFrench-language works237,207