Primary Electron Donor(s) in Isolated Reaction Center of Photosystem II from Chlamydomonas reinhardtii
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Isolated reaction centers (RCs) from wild-type Chlamydomonas (C.) reinhardtii of Photosystem II (PSII), at different levels of intactness, were studied to provide more insight into the nature of the charge-separation (CS) pathway(s). We argue that previously studied D1/D2/Cytb559 complexes (referred to as RC680), with ChlD1 serving as the primary electron donor, contain destabilized D1 and D2 polypeptides and, as a result, do not provide a representative model system for the intact RC within the PSII core. The shapes of nonresonant transient hole-burned (HB) spectra obtained for more intact RCs (referred to as RC684) are very similar to P(+)QA(-) - PQA absorbance difference and triplet minus singlet spectra measured in PSII core complexes from Synechocystis PCC 6803 [Schlodder et al. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London, Ser. B2008, 363, 1197]. We show that in the RC684 complexes, both PD1 and ChlD1 may serve as primary electron donors, leading to two different charge separation pathways. Resonant HB spectra cannot distinguish the CS times corresponding to different paths, but it is likely that the zero-phonon holes (ZPHs) observed in the 680-685 nm region (corresponding to CS times of ∼1.4-4.4 ps) reveal the ChlD1 pathway; conversely, the observation of charge-transfer (CT) state(s) in RC684 (in the 686-695 nm range) and the absence of ZPHs at λB > 685 nm likely stem from the PD1 pathway, for which CS could be faster than 1 ps. This is consistent with the finding of Krausz et al. [Photochem. Photobiol. Sci.2005, 4, 744] that CS in intact PSII core complexes can be initiated at low temperatures with fairly long-wavelength excitation. The lack of a clear shift of HB spectra as a function of excitation wavelength within the red-tail of the absorption (i.e., 686-695 nm) and the absence of ZPHs suggest that the lowest-energy CT state is largely homogeneously broadened. On the other hand, in usually studied destabilized RCs, that is, RC680, for which CT states have never been experimentally observed, ChlD1 is the most likely electron donor.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".