MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2331392729 · doi:10.1097/icb.0000000000000071

AN OTHERWISE HEALTHY YOUNG MAN PRESENTS WITH BILATERAL CRVO AS THE FIRST SIGN OF HYPERVISCOSITY SYNDROME IN THE SETTING OF NEW MULTIPLE MYELOMA

2014· article· en· W2331392729 on OpenAlexaff
Elizabeth Golesic, Tom Sheidow

Bibliographic record

VenueRetinal Cases & Brief Reports · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMultiple Myeloma Research and Treatments
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineHyperviscosity syndromeCentral retinal vein occlusionBortezomibMultiple myelomaCyclophosphamideHyperviscosityEtiologyLenalidomideSurgeryInternal medicineRetinalOphthalmologyChemotherapyMacular edemaBlood viscosity

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In Brief Purpose: To report a case of bilateral central retinal vein occlusion as the presenting feature of new onset multiple myeloma in an otherwise healthy man. Methods: A 44-year-old man presented with painless visual changes in his left eye. Ophthalmic examination revealed what appeared to be bilateral central retinal vein occlusion and hematologic assessment resulted in the diagnosis of immunoglobulin G multiple myeloma. Results: Initial management was plasma exchange followed by a chemotherapy regimen of cyclophosphamide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone, and subsequent plans for bone marrow transplant. Conclusion: Hyperviscosity syndrome seems similar to central retinal vein occlusion and may be associated with systemic conditions such as diabetes and atherosclerosis; however, alternative etiologies should be considered in young otherwise healthy individuals. This case underscores the need for diligent and thorough investigations for less common systemic conditions associated with retinal vein occlusions by primary care ophthalmologists. Hyperviscosity syndrome seems similar to central retinal vein occlusion and may be associated with systemic conditions such as diabetes and atherosclerosis; however, alternative etiologies should be considered in young otherwise healthy individuals. This case underscores the need for diligent and thorough investigations for less common systemic conditions associated with retinal vein occlusions by primary care ophthalmologists.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0030.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.301
Teacher spread0.279 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRetinal Cases & Brief ReportsSame topicMultiple Myeloma Research and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207