Microphase separation in comblike liquid-crystalline diblock copolymers
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The interplay between liquid crystallinity and microphase separation in comblike liquid-crystalline diblock copolymers is examined via a Brazovskii-type phenomenological model using both analytical and numerical calculations. For symmetric diblock copolymers we determine a critical electric field that is required to tilt the orientation of the constituent liquid crystals of the polymer side chains in the microphase-separated lamellar state. Such electrically induced reorientation of the liquid-crystal molecules can lead to substantially large changes of lamellar periodicity. Our numerical results show that highly aligned polymer lamellar domains can self-assemble when the liquid-crystal ordering precedes microphase separation, and that weak electric fields can be used to direct the self-assembly process due to the dielectric anisotropy of the liquid-crystal side chains. We also find that phase separation of asymmetric diblock copolymers can coexist with a network of liquid-crystal nematic orientations, with domain morphology depending on the details of copolymer and liquid-crystal coupling.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".