MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2331484623 · doi:10.2299/jsp.17.1

Construction and Performance of Authentication Systems for Fingerprint with Neural Networks

2013· article· en· W2331484623 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Signal Processing · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicBiometric Identification and Security
Canadian institutionsTembec
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAuthentication (law)Fingerprint (computing)Computer scienceArtificial neural networkBackpropagationFingerprint recognitionArtificial intelligencePattern recognition (psychology)Data miningComputer security

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We construct the authentication system for fingerprint with multi-steps, which were 3-layered neural networks with a backpropagation learning algorithm. The authentication system consists of large classification with 1 step and small classification with 16 steps. As a result, the system is useful for the authentication system with a very large number of input patterns. From the results, we found that the authentication rate at each 1 step was 99.985% and that the authentication rates of the system increased with the number of steps and were estimated by the equation, {100-(0.015)**N}, where N is the number of steps. Therefore, the authentication rates of the system are controllable by the number of steps.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.986
Threshold uncertainty score0.187

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it