MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2331499210 · doi:10.2514/6.2015-4149

Microgravity PMD investigations by miniaturization of the test sample

2015· article· en· W2331499210 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venue51st AIAA/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSpacecraft and Cryogenic Technologies
Canadian institutionsInternational Air Transport Association
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMiniaturizationComputer scienceSample (material)Test (biology)Materials scienceNanotechnologyChemistryChromatography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The main objective of the presented work was to recreate the effect of a microgravity environment in conventional ground-based laboratories by decreasing the scale of the test sample. In order to assess the viability of such a technique, an experimental study of a sponge-type control PMD (Propellant management Device) was carried out. For the purpose of the study, a dedicated test rig was developed and built to perform tests at different sponge's scales at the research laboratory of fluid mechanics CMEFE of HEPIA in Geneva. The miniaturization of the sponges was performed by Wire Electrical Discharge Machining (WEDM) which allowed to manufacture the miniaturized sponges. For steady state investigations, experimental tests were performed and compared with theoretical data, based on the dimensionless number analysis. In order to reproduce physical similarity of the microgravity behavior, a known Bond Number was imposed in the experimental campaigns.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.027
Threshold uncertainty score0.748

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.182 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it