Detecting neuropathy using measures of motor unit activation extracted from standard concentric needle electromyographic signals
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Motor unit loss associated with neuropathic disorders affects motor unit activation. Quantitative electromyographic (EMG) features of motor unit activation estimated from the sequences of motor unit potentials (MUPs) created by concurrently active motor units can support the detection of neuropathic disorders. Interpretation of most motor unit activation feature values are, however, confounded by uncertainty regarding the level of muscle activation during EMG signal detection. A set of new features circumventing these limitations are proposed, and their utility in detecting neuropathy is investigated using simulated and clinical EMG signals. METHODS: The firing sequence of a motor neuron was simulated using a compartmentalized Hodgkin-Huxley based model. A pool of motor neurons was modelled such that each motor neuron was subjected to a common level of activation. The detection of the firing sequence of a motor neuron using a clinically detected EMG signal was simulated using a model of muscle anatomy combined with a model representing muscle fiber electrophysiology and the voltage detection properties of a concentric needle electrode. SIGNIFICANCE: Findings are based on simulated EMG data representing 30 normal and 30 neuropathic muscles as well as clinical EMG data collected from the tibialis anterior muscle of 48 control subjects and 30 subjects with neuropathic disorders. These results demonstrate the possibility of detecting neuropathy using motor unit recruitment and mean firing rate feature values estimated from standard concentric needle detected EMG signals.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".