MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2331548178 · doi:10.1021/je200355f

Phase Behavior of Athabasca Bitumen

2011· article· en· W2331548178 on OpenAlex
Ala Bazyleva, Michal Fulem, Mildred Becerra, Bei Zhao, John M. Shaw

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Chemical & Engineering Data · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicPetroleum Processing and Analysis
Canadian institutionsNatural Resources CanadaUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemistryOil sandsAsphaltenePentaneDifferential scanning calorimetryEndothermic processDissolutionAsphaltAnalytical Chemistry (journal)Phase transitionPhase (matter)MineralogyThermodynamicsChromatographyOrganic chemistryAdsorptionMaterials scienceComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The phase behavior of Athabasca bitumen (Alberta, Canada) was determined from nanofiltered permeates and retentates with pentane-asphaltene mass fractions w A ranging from 0.053 to 0.57, and chemically separated Athabasca pentane maltenes and pentane asphaltenes based on differential scanning calorimetry and rheology measurements from (190 to 570) K at atmospheric pressure. Samples were subject to two sequential heating cycles. Composition, apparent heat-capacity, and phase-angle data were collected and interpreted jointly to define phase diagrams for nanofiltered maltene + nanofiltered asphaltene pseudobinary mixtures for each heating cycle. These pseudocomponents are shown to behave independently. During the first heating cycle, observed phase transitions for maltenes include: a broad low-temperature glass transition with a T g from (215 to 230) K and a small first-order phase transition with a peak temperature T trs between (320 and 340) K linked to a fraction of Athabasca maltenes undergoing a crystal to liquid transition. These transitions were found in both chemically separated and nanofiltered maltenes. Nanofiltered asphaltenes undergo a two-stage transition from solid to liquid between (260 and 470) K, with the second stage being a glass type transition. The nature of the first stage requires additional study. By contrast, chemically separated pentane asphaltenes undergo a complex transformation from (310 to 530) K comprising overlapping processes including endothermic transitions from solid-to-liquid and solid-to-liquid crystals and an exothermic dissolution of the liquid crystals [Bagheri, S. R., et al. Energy Fuels 2010, 24, 4327–4332]. Athabasca bitumen comprises a minimum of four phases drawn from liquid, crystalline maltene + glass and/or crystal, and liquid asphaltenes from (260 to 360) K. The phase transition reversibility is discussed, and the phase diagram for Athabasca bitumen is compared with that of Maya crude oil, reported previously [Fulem, M., et al. Fluid Phase Equilib. 2008, 272, 32–41]. Multiphase behavior appears to be a general phenomenon, but phase diagram details appear to vary from feedstock to feedstock.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.399

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.277
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it