Geochronology, Geochemistry, and Fluid Characterization of the Late Miocene Buriticá Gold Deposit, Antioquia Department, Colombia
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Buriticá is an intermediate sulfidation epithermal gold deposit located 75 km north of Medellín, Colombia. It is hosted by the late Miocene Buriticá andesite porphyry, a shallow-level pluton dated at 7.41 ± 0.40 Ma (2σ, MSWD = 2.30; 40Ar/39Ar on hornblende), which intrudes volcanic and sedimentary rocks of the Cretaceous Barroso Formation and the Buriticá stock. Gold mineralization is associated with proximal sericite-adularia and distal epidote-dominant propylitic alteration, and is hosted in two different sets of veins striking and dipping ~072°/87°S and ~105°/87°S. Hydrothermal muscovite from altered host rock yielded a weighted average 40Ar/39Ar age of 7.74 ± 0.08 Ma for two samples, which is within error of the age of the Buriticá andesite porphyry. Sulfur isotope, oxygen isotope, and fluid inclusion data indicate that a relatively hot and saline fluid (~310°C, up to ~8 wt % NaCl equiv) of probable magmatic origin was dominant during stage 1 of the vein paragenesis, and mixed with cooler and less saline groundwater during stages 2 and 3. Fluid inclusion assemblages indicate that boiling was likely the main control on gold precipitation, with cooling and dilution during fluid mixing as a possible secondary control.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".