LATE RETINAL NEOVASCULARIZATION AFTER CENTRAL RETINAL VEIN OCCLUSION
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In Brief Purpose: To present the case of a 59-year-old man with central retinal vein occlusion with limited retinal ischemia who developed retinal neovascularization over a year after initial presentation. Methods: Retrospective case report. Results: On initial presentation, the patient had counting fingers vision in the affected eye and significant macular edema. After 4 intravitreal ranibizumab injections, his vision improved to 20/30. An intravenous fluorescein angiography performed at presentation and at a 4-month follow-up revealed limited retinal ischemia and no neovascularization. Over a year after his initial presentation, the patient returned with visual symptoms and was found to have subhyaloid hemorrhage and areas of retinal neovascularization. Conclusion: Anterior and posterior segment neovascularization after central retinal vein occlusion has traditionally been thought to occur within a few months of the inciting event. However, the use of antivascular endothelial growth factor agents may alter the angiogenic processes within an eye after central retinal vein occlusion, potentially delaying the onset of neovascularization. This suggests the need for enhanced monitoring in this patient population. A 59-year-old man presented with severe visual loss secondary to central retinal vein occlusion. At presentation, he had significant macular edema that responded well to ranibizumab, resulting in excellent visual recovery and suggesting limited ischemia; however, the patient returned with retinal neovascularization and a subhyaloid hemorrhage well over a year after his initial central retinal vein occlusion.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".