MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Identifying Molecular Mechanisms of the Late-Phase Asthmatic Response by Integrating Cellular, Gene, and Metabolite Levels in Blood

2016· article· en· W2331680519 on OpenAlexaff
Amrit Singh, Casey P. Shannon, Young Woong Kim, Mari L. DeMarco, Gail M. Gauvreau, J. Mark FitzGerald, Louis‐Philippe Boulet, Paul M. O’Byrne, Kim‐Anh Lê Cao, Scott J. Tebbutt

Bibliographic record

VenueAnnals of the American Thoracic Society · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAsthma and respiratory diseases
Canadian institutionsUniversité LavalMcMaster UniversitySt. Paul's HospitalUniversity of British ColumbiaProvidence Health CarePrevention of Organ Failure
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineMetaboliteAsthmaImmunologyGene expressionGeneInhalationComputational biologyInternal medicineBiologyGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

RATIONALE: Individuals with allergic asthma respond differently, but reproducibly, to allergen inhalation challenge. Some individuals develop an isolated early response (early responders) (ERs), whereas others go on to develop a late response (dual responders) (DRs). It is not understood why late responses do not develop in all sensitized individuals. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to identify blood biomarkers that can discriminate ERs and DRs using cellular frequencies and gene and metabolite expression from whole blood. METHODS: Thirty-two individuals participated in the allergen inhalation challenge as part of the AllerGen Clinical Investigator Collaborative. Fifteen participants were classified as ERs and 17 as DRs. Blood samples were collected before (pre) and 2 hours after (post) the allergen challenge. Cell counts were obtained using a hematolyzer, gene transcript relative levels using RNA sequencing, and metabolite concentrations using tandem mass spectrometry. An integrative ensemble algorithm that was based on canonical correlation analysis was used to classify ERs and DRs using all three data sets, adjusting for age and sex. The objective of this algorithm was to identify a correlated subset of molecules from each data set that best discriminated ERs from DRs. Gene set enrichment analysis was performed using Enrichr (Chen et al., BMC Bioinformatics 2013;128). MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The pre-challenge multisignature classifier (error = 30%) outperformed the post-challenge multisignature classifier (error = 50%) in separating ERs from DRs. The cells selected in the prechallenge multisignature panel included eosinophils, lymphocytes, and neutrophils. The selected metabolites were enriched for glycerophospholipids. The subset of gene transcripts in the multisignature panel was enriched for the T-cell receptor and costimulatory signaling pathway (P = 3.4 × 10(-6)) (Wikipathways) and positive regulation of antigen receptor-mediated signaling pathway (P = 5.7 × 10(-4)) (GO Ontology). CONCLUSIONS: This study provides a systems perspective on the deregulated molecular processes between early and dual responses in whole blood. The integrative biomarker analysis suggests that a molecular signature that is predictive of the late-phase response can be identified. The variability in the onset of the late response may explain the poor predictive performance of the postchallenge multiomic biomarker signature. Replication of the prechallenge biomarker signature in additional independent samples is required to validate this panel.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.050
GPT teacher head0.374
Teacher spread0.324 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnnals of the American Thoracic SocietySame topicAsthma and respiratory diseasesFrench-language works237,207