MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2331692509 · doi:10.1055/s-0034-1387060

Zivilgesellschaftliches Engagement im Ernährungsbereich – Ergebnisse einer Studie zu den Motiven und zur Bedeutung von Gesundheitsaspekten aus Sicht der Aktiven bei der Organisation Slow Food

2014· article· de· W2331692509 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueDas Gesundheitswesen · 2014
Typearticle
Languagede
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicOrganic Food and Agriculture
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical scienceGynecologyHumanitiesArtMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Hintergrund: Der Ottawa-Charta zur Gesundheitsförderung (1986) zufolge ist in der Gesundheitsförderung das gemeinschaftliche Engagement von Bürgern in ihrer Lebenswelt ein entscheidender Erfolgsfaktor [1]. Gesunde Ernährung stellt ein zentrales Ziel von Gesundheitsförderung dar. Aber auch außerhalb von Gesundheitsförderungsprojekten lässt sich zivilgesellschaftliches Engagement zum Thema Essen/Ernährung beobachten („food activism“). Obwohl „food activism“ in der bisherigen Forschung zum Teil sogar als wachsende soziale Bewegung beschrieben wird [2], steht die wissenschaftliche Untersuchung des Themas vor allem in Deutschland noch am Anfang.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.403
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it