Signaling Over Two-User Parallel Gaussian Interference Channels: Outage Analysis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper presents an outage analysis for a two-user parallel Gaussian interference channel consisting of two sub-channels. Each sub-channel is modeled as a two-user Gaussian interference channel with quasi-static and flat fading. Both users employ single-layer Gaussian code-books and maintain a statistical correlation ρ between the signals transmitted over the underlying sub-channels. When joint decoding (JD) is performed at the receivers, setting ρ = 0 minimizes the outage probability, regardless of the value of the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). It is shown, however, that if the receivers treat interference as noise (TIN) or cancel interference (CI), the value of optimum ρ approaches 1 as SNR goes to infinity. Motivated by these observations, we let ρ = 0 under JD and ρ = 1 under TIN and CI and compute the outage probability in finite SNR, assuming that the direct and crossover channel coefficients are independent zero-mean complex Gaussian random variables with possibly different variances. In the asymptote of large SNR and assuming the transmission rate per user is r log snr, it is shown that the outage probability scales like snr-(1-r)under both TIN and CI, while it vanishes at least as fast as snr-min{2-r,4(1-r)}log snr under JD. This paper is concluded by extending some of the results to a two-user parallel Gaussian interference channel with an arbitrary number of sub-channels.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".