Gyne-Oncology Interactive Problem-Based Cases for Postgraduate Residents
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract This educational resource is a series of five interactive problem-based cases that focus on the management of patients presenting with cancers of the female reproductive tract (cancer of the cervix, endometrium, vulva, ovary and gestational trophoblastic disease). Each case was originally designed to be used in an academic half-day 3 hours in length and facilitated by a content expert. However, the cases can be used by learners independently or in a group. Questions in the cases facilitate the diagnostic and clinical reasoning skills of residents. Ideally the cases can be enhanced by adding appropriate clinical, histology, and pathology images. The cases were designed and delivered as part of a medical education research project analyzing what type of learning was taking place in the protected time set aside for resident learning. Prior to the introduction of these cases, the formats of the educational sessions were primarily didactic (PowerPoint presentations). Although residents reported enjoying these sessions, they did not prepare for them, interact during them, or reflect on them. After these academic sessions were changed to case-based discussion, the residents uniformly reported a significant increase in self-directed study behaviors before, during, and after the sessions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".