MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2331810794 · doi:10.2741/4196

Collagen matrix support of pancreatic islet survival and function

2014· review· en· W2331810794 on OpenAlexaff
Matthew Riopel

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in bioscience · 2014
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPancreatic function and diabetes
Canadian institutionsChildren’s Health Research InstituteWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIsletExtracellular matrixCell biologyTransplantationReceptorChemistryIn vitroPancreasIntegrinIslet cell transplantationPancreatic isletsCellMedicineDiabetes mellitusEndocrinologyBiologyInternal medicineBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Diabetes mellitus is a chronic condition resulting from insufficient β-cell mass, which leads to improper glycemia regulation. Research efforts have focused on expanding islets and β-cells in vitro for use in cell-based therapies to cure diabetes. Collagens are triple-helix extracellular matrix proteins with widespread expression in mammals. With multiple functions, collagen can provide structural integrity in addition to mediating cellular signaling. In the pancreas, collagens I and IV are abundant and support cell structures while also stimulating cell surface receptors to influence pancreatic cell processes. Collagen-based materials and scaffolds have also been used to assist in the maintenance and expansion of islet cells in vitro, primarily through integrin and discoindin domain receptors. Islet transplantation using collagen-based scaffolds may improve long-term glycemic control, but progressive research efforts are required to realize this potential in humans. This review will outline the critical role played by native collagens I and IV and their receptors in maintaining islet function. The advantages of using collagens I and IV as culture gels/scaffolds and islet encapsulation vehicles for transplantation will be described.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.307
Teacher spread0.282 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations67
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrontiers in bioscienceSame topicPancreatic function and diabetesFrench-language works237,207