MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2331817626 · doi:10.1097/mib.0000000000000167

Decline in IBD Incidence in Québec

2014· letter· en· W2331817626 on OpenAlexaffabout
Alain Bitton, Maria Vutcovici, Valérie Patenaude, Maida Sewitch, Samy Suissa, Paul Brassard

Bibliographic record

VenueInflammatory Bowel Diseases · 2014
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMicroscopic Colitis
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityJewish General HospitalMcGill University Health Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIncidence (geometry)MedicinePediatricsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We read with interest Dr. Kaplan's editorial, “Pitfalls and Perils of Using Administrative Databases to Evaluate the Incidence of Inflammatory Bowel Disease Overtime,” in which he described the advantages and disadvantages of using administrative health data in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) research and addressed some methodological issues that can bias IBD incidence estimates.1 Kaplan concluded that the decline in IBD incidence observed in Québec was due to flaws in study methodology that produced a mixing of prevalent and incident cases. We agree that a major bias would be introduced if, in a given study, different washout periods were used before disease incidence is identified. This situation would occur if the washout period started from the study baseline, disregarding the fact that subjects enrolled in the health plan at a later point in time would not benefit from the same length washout period. To avoid this bias, the washout period needs to be implemented at the individual level, as was done in the Québec IBD cohort. The 2-year washout period was applied across the board before the first IBD contact that contributed to the case-defining algorithm, regardless of the time of enrollment in the health plan. Kaplan also raised the issue of the lack of validation for the washout period in Québec, assuming that in other provinces, the washout had been implicitly validated along with the case-identifying algorithm itself. However, none of the cited studies indicates that a validation of a washout period was conducted, which would have entailed testing several periods of varying lengths to identify the one that best fits the data.2 One article addressing IBD incidence in Ontario children clearly stated that the 3-year “lookback” period was selected based on the expert opinion of the clinicians conducting the research.3 This approach is common in IBD and other diseases, wherein the length of the washout period is arbitrarily defined by the investigators based on clinical experience and the characteristics of the disease.4,–6 A second methodological issue Kaplan presented as a possible explanation for our results is the use of the last of 4 IBD physician contacts to define incidence instead of the first, as occurred in all other provinces. This is a critical issue, because a subject cannot be counted as an incident case before meeting all IBD case-defining criteria (4 contacts). Considering IBD diagnosis at the first IBD contact rather than at the case-defining one may cause biases of up to 53% in incidence estimates.7 Furthermore, using the first rather than the last contact induces immortal time bias in prospective studies, in that the time required to fulfill all criteria is inherently immortal because every subject with IBD must survive long enough (until the fourth IBD contact) to be declared a case. For example, a study examining the effect of a treatment or intervention occurring after the first IBD contact would show increased survival in IBD cases, since by definition, all cases survive the time it takes to reach the fourth IBD contact, but no such benefit would be seen in the comparison group. Immortal time bias has been thoroughly addressed in the context of pharmacoepidemiology.8 Finally, Kaplan mentioned the lack of validation in Québec of the Alberta case-identifying algorithm as potential explanation for the declining trend in incidence we observed for the 2001–2008 period. However, a declining incidence for Crohn's disease was also observed in Québec for the 1998–2000 period, using an algorithm developed in Manitoba and validated in Québec.9 Furthermore, when the same Manitoba algorithm was applied to our current data, not only was the number of cases identified similar but the declining trend in incidence also remained significant (data not shown). In conclusion, we believe our findings reflect a true decline in incidence rates in Québec. This decline could be part of a change in the epidemiologic pattern for IBD in North America, especially in the context of the decline in Crohn's disease incidence observed among middle age adults in Manitoba,10 the overall decline in IBD incidence in Alberta11 and Nova Scotia,12 and the stabilization of incidence rates in the United States during the past 3 decades.13

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.101
Threshold uncertainty score0.203

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0080.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.265
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2014
Admission routes2
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueInflammatory Bowel DiseasesSame topicMicroscopic ColitisFrench-language works237,207