MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2331866424 · doi:10.1021/ie500608w

Dynamic Operability Analysis of Process Supply Chains for Forest Industry Transformation

2014· article· en· W2331866424 on OpenAlexaff
Richard Mastragostino, Christopher L.E. Swartz

Bibliographic record

VenueIndustrial & Engineering Chemistry Research · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicProcess Optimization and Integration
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOperabilitySupply chainComputer scienceSupply and demandProcess (computing)Pareto principleKey (lock)Product (mathematics)Supply chain optimizationOperations researchSupply chain managementBusinessOperations managementEconomicsMicroeconomicsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An important attribute of a supply chain in a competitive and volatile market environment is the ability to respond rapidly to demand variation. A particularly relevant application is the forest products industry, where a promising strategy to improve the struggling business model entails the shift from commodity products toward high-value specialty products. A key implication is that new process and supply chain designs have sufficient capability to respond quickly to market changes, such that product availability is high. In this study, we develop a computational framework for dynamic operability analysis of process supply chains. A dynamic model of a multiproduct, multiechelon system supply chain system is developed, and incorporated within an optimization framework. A two-stage stochastic programming approach is applied for the treatment of demand uncertainty. A bicriterion optimization problem is formulated for generating the Pareto frontier between an economic and responsiveness criterion. Two case studies are presented to demonstrate the applicability of this framework.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.023

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.333
Teacher spread0.292 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIndustrial & Engineering Chemistry ResearchSame topicProcess Optimization and IntegrationFrench-language works237,207