Transformation of Rice’s small perturbation solution for rough surface scattering into the high frequency reciprocal physical and geometric optics solutions
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A step by step transformation of the low frequency small height and slope perturbation solution into the high frequency reciprocal and dual, physical and geometrical optic solutions is presented. The familiar Kirchhoff approximations for the fields impressed by the incident plane wave upon the rough surfaces results in nonreciprocal solutions. It is shown that the surface element scattering coefficients based on the Kirchhoff approximations agree with the corresponding reciprocal physical optics solutions only at the stationary phase, specular points on the rough surfaces. While the Kirchhoff approximations and physical optics approximations are based on the characterization of the surface fields by Fresnel reflection coefficients, the corresponding surface element scatter coefficient derived for the small perturbation solution and the full wave solutions are based on the imposition of boundary conditions for the tangential components of the electric and magnetic fields. A flow graph schematically depicting the relationships between these solutions for the scattered fields is also presented.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".