FERDOWSIITE: A NEW MINERAL FROM THE BARIKA ORE DEPOSIT, IRAN
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Ferdowsiite is a member of a mineral association subsidiary to the principal metamorphic minerals of the Barika ore deposit in NW Iran. The empirical formula of ferdowsiite (based on 32 apfu, 16Me + 16S) is Ag7.97Pb0.08 Sb4.75As3.15Bi0.01S16.04. The crystal-structure formula is Ag8(Sb5.49As2.51)∑8S16; the simplified formula is Ag8(Sb5As3)∑8S16. The slightly plumbian variety of ferdowsiite has the idealized formula Pb2xAg4−xSb3−xAsS8 with x =~0.2. Ferdowsiite is monoclinic, space group P21/n, a 8.677(2) Å, b 5.799(1) Å, c 13.839(3) Å, β 96.175(4)°, V 692.28(10) Å3, Z = 1 for the formula Ag8(Sb5As3)∑8S16. Calculated powder X-ray data are listed; main diffraction lines are [dcalc (Irel) (hkl)]: 3.225 (96)(113); 3.205 (100)(2̅12); 2.8995 (78)(020); 2.7559 (90)(301); 2.7073 (79)(1̅05); 1.9401 (22)(206); 1.9226 (22)(4̅04). Plumbian ferdowsiite has the same space group, P21/n. It has a 8.746(7) Å, b 5.805(4) Å, c 13.929(10) Å, β 96.236(11)°, unit cell volume 703.05 Å3. The mineral is greyish black, opaque, with dark grey streak and metallic luster. It is brittle with irregular fracture; no cleavage or parting was observed. Calculated density is 5.3 g/cm3. In reflected light ferdowsiite is greyish white. Internal reflections are not observable. Pleochroism is distinct, white to grey. Bireflectance is distinct; reflectance values are [λ(nm), Rmin,Rmax]: 470, 34.9, 37.3; 546, 33.4, 35.9; 589, 32.4, 35.1; 650, 30.7, 33.5. Anisotropism is distinct and rotation tints vary between dark brown and bluish grey. Ferdowsiite is associated with large corroded crystals of arsenquatrandorite and is partly replaced by guettardite. It also corrodes smithite. Ferdowsiite is often associated with tetrahedrite/tennantite and forms worm-like symplectites with it. This symplectite is partly replaced on the surface by guettardite. Ferdowsiite is one more member of the group of ABX2-type sulfosalts of silver, combining antimony and arsenic, with a crystal structure different from other members of this group. The closest crystallographic and structural affinity is to the ternary sulfosalt diaphorite
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".