Formation of Gallaoxetanes: C–O Activation of 1,2-Epoxybutane by Ground-State Ga Atoms
Bibliographic record
Abstract
(69/71)Ga atoms were reacted with 1,2-epoxybutane and its isotopomers, 1,2-epoxybutane-1,1-d(2) (CH(3)CH(2)CHOCD(2)) and 1,2-epoxybutane-2-d(1) (CH(3)CH(2)CDOCH(2)), under matrix-isolation conditions. The novel gallaoxetanes CH(3)CH(2)CHCH(2)GaO and CH(3)CH(2)CHCH(2)OGa, resulting from the insertion of the metal atom in the C(1)-O and C(2)-O bonds, respectively, of the 1,2-epoxybutane, were detected by EPR spectroscopy. The Ga and H hyperfine interaction (hfi) values of the gallaoxetanes, calculated using a DFT method, were used to help assign the EPR spectra. A third Ga-centered species, detected at 190 K, underwent spectral changes similar to those of the C(2)-O insertion product upon isotopic substitution of the 1,2-epoxybutane. Although the Ga hfi for this species was 36% smaller than that of the C(2)-O insertion product, the values for the H hfi were similar, suggesting that the carrier of the spectrum was the C(2)-O insertion product where Ga was perturbed by the matrix constraints. The alkyl radical CH(3)CH(2)(•CH)CH(2)OGa, resulting from ring-opening at the C(2)-O bond of 1,2-epoxybutane, was observed at temperatures below 150 K. This radical has been implicated in the formation of the C(2)-O insertion product. The unusually small value found for two of the β-hydrogens of the alkyl radical is discussed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".