MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2331909254 · doi:10.1103/physreve.89.043307

Algorithm to enforce uniform density in liquid atomistic subdomains with specular boundaries

2014· article· en· W2331909254 on OpenAlexfundno aff
K. M. Issa, Pietro Poesio

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical Review E · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicMaterial Dynamics and Properties
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersMinistero dell’Istruzione, dell’Università e della RicercaWestern Canada Research GridUniversity of Calgary
KeywordsSpecular reflectionMaterials scienceStatistical physicsComputer sciencePhysicsOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An important component in hybrid atomistic-continuum (HAC) modeling of liquids is the proper termination of the atomistic subdomain (ΩA). When the HAC model is based on the Schwarz domain decomposition method, the total number of particles in ΩA is conserved using specular boundaries in an overlap region, where information is exchanged with the continuum subdomain (ΩC). This non-periodic termination of ΩA fails to account for forces otherwise included in a periodic system, through the minimum image convention. The absence of such forces results in spurious density fluctuations adjacent to the specular boundaries. In this work, we present a new boundary force algorithm that establishes a uniform density profile at non-periodic boundaries of ΩA. We also examine the effects of the non-periodic termination of ΩA on the liquid properties. The algorithm relies on force measurements carried out over a spatially discretized atomistic subdomain. It is relatively straightforward to implement and can be seamlessly extended to higher dimensions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical Review ESame topicMaterial Dynamics and PropertiesFrench-language works237,207