A Moderate Dose of Pseudoephedrine Does Not Alter Muscle Contraction Strength or Anaerobic Power
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of an acute oral administration of pseudoephedrine (PSE) on muscle function, fatigue, and anaerobic power output. DESIGN AND MATERIALS: Healthy males (N = 10) and females (N = 10) were allocated to receive both a placebo and PSE (120 mg) using a randomized, double-blind, crossover experimental design. Each subject had their maximal voluntary contraction strength and fatigability measured for both handgrip and ankle dorsi-flexion. Following the strength measurements, a 30-second maximal cycle test was performed to determine lower extremity anaerobic power and fatigue. Plasma lactate was measured before and after exercise. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in any of the outcome variables between the placebo and PSE trials. CONCLUSIONS: These results demonstrated that a 120 mg dose of PSE did not enhance force production, time to fatigue, fatigue index, or power output in young men or women. Therefore, there does not appear to be an ergogenic benefit from the ingestion of 120 mg PSE in high-intensity exercise performance.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".