Intraoperative Assessment of Closed Reduction for Developmental Dislocation of the Hip Using 3-Dimensional Fluoroscopy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Postoperative imaging for operatively treated developmental dislocation of the hip typically uses computed tomography or a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Neither imaging modality offers the ability to intervene intraoperatively. The 3-dimensional (3D) C-arm provides an attractive alternative providing immediate intraoperative feedback on the quality of a hip reduction. Our primary research question was to determine whether 3D fluoroscopy could assess hip position after closed reduction and spica casting. Secondary questions included whether reduction was maintained postoperatively when compared with postoperative MRI, and to determine the radiation dose received by the infant. METHODS: We retrospectively identified 16 patients from 2010 to 2013 who underwent closed reduction and spica casting for a developmentally dislocated hip who underwent both intraoperative 3D fluoroscopy and postoperative MRI imaging. Scans were retrieved and assessed by a blinded pediatric orthopaedic fellow. Assessment of hip reduction was graded based on the modified Shenton line of the pelvis in axial plane images. Effective radiation doses between imaging modalities were compared using an anthropomorphic phantom. RESULTS: All hips were reduced on 3D fluoroscopic images. Comparing the intraoperative 3D scans with the postoperative MRI images all 16 hips were in the same position. At 12 weeks all hips were reduced and no signs of subluxation were identified on the plain anteroposterior radiograph. 3D fluoroscopy achieved the lowest effective dose of radiation per study measuring 0.3 mSv compared with 0.5 mSv for low-dose CT and 0.48 mSv for 60 seconds of live fluoroscopy. CONCLUSIONS: Accurate assessment of the quality of hip reduction is possible in the axial plane using 3D fluoroscopy with no significant loss of reduction in the early postoperative period. When comparing the effective radiation exposure to limited-cut computed tomography protocols, 3D fluoroscopy offers a low-dose alternative that may facilitate cost savings and early discharge. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Diagnostic studies-investigating a diagnostic test; study of nonconsecutive patients with consistently applied gold standard; level III.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".