MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2332054661 · doi:10.1093/jee/tov344

Development and Evaluation of Degree-Day Models for<i>Acrolepiopsis assectella</i>(Lepidoptera: Acrolepiidae) Based on Hosts and Flight Patterns

2015· article· en· W2332054661 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Masanori Seto, Anthony M. Shelton

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Economic Entomology · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicInsect-Plant Interactions and Control
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Institute of Food and Agriculture
KeywordsBiologyLepidoptera genitaliaPEST analysisPopulationDegree dayIntegrated pest managementAlliumFirst generationGrowing seasonToxicologyHorticultureAgronomyEcologyDemographyGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The leek moth, Acrolepiopsis assectella (Zeller), was first discovered in Ottawa, Canada, during the 1993 growing season, representing the first known occurrence of this species in North America. Since then, it has become a significant concern in Allium vegetable production including garlic, leeks, and onions. Acrolepiopsis assectella was first detected in the contiguous United States during the 2009 growing season in northern New York. In this study, we evaluated the development of the US A. assectella population in the laboratory and commercial onion fields. Our results showed that this population required 443.9 degree-days to complete its life cycle on onions in the laboratory. The development of A. assectella on onion did not significantly differ from populations reared on garlic or leeks. Field studies revealed three distinct flight periods for overwintered, first- and second-generation adult males in northern New York. Life cycle duration in the field ranged from 4 to 8 wk. The degree-day prediction model evaluated in this study provided accurate estimates of the occurrence of the following generation. We conclude that this model can help growers to implement appropriate management strategies for different life stages in a timely manner and lessen damage by this new invasive pest.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.851
Threshold uncertainty score0.196

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.068
GPT teacher head0.276
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Economic EntomologySame topicInsect-Plant Interactions and ControlFrench-language works237,207