MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2332092472 · doi:10.1139/cjc-2012-0418

Theoretical study on the reaction of atomic oxygen with unsymmetrical dimethylhydrazine

2013· article· en· W2332092472 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Jinmiao Wen, Yafang Tian, Hongqing He, Li Wang

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Chemistry · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAdvanced Chemical Physics Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersHenan UniversityNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsChemistryReaction rate constantDimethylhydrazineReactivity (psychology)Atmospheric temperature rangeHydrogen atom abstractionQuantum tunnellingComputational chemistryPhysical chemistryAtomic oxygenOxygenThermodynamicsKineticsHydrogenQuantum mechanicsOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A dual-level direct dynamics method is employed to study the reaction mechanism of (CH3)2NNH2 (unsymmetrical dimethylhydrazine) with the oxygen (O) atom. The geometries and frequencies of all the stationary points are optimized at the MPW1K/6-311G (d, p) level, and the energy profiles are further refined by the interpolated single-point energies (ISPE) method at the BMC-CCSD level of theory. The rate constants of the O atom with (CH3)2NNH2 are evaluated over a wide temperature range of 200–2000 K by using the canonical variational transition-state theory (CVT) with the small curvature tunneling correction (SCT). The agreement between the theoretical and experimental rate constants is good around room temperature. The channels of H abstraction from the -NH2 position favor temperatures below 1200 K. With increasing temperature, contributions from other channels should be taken into account. The reactivity of N2H4, CH3NHNH2, and (CH3)2NNH2 toward atomic O is compared to explore the methylation effect.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.212
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of ChemistrySame topicAdvanced Chemical Physics StudiesFrench-language works237,207