MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2332127784 · doi:10.2514/6.2009-2862

Dynamics Modeling for an Unmanned, Unstable, Fin-Less Airship

2009· article· en· W2332127784 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAerospace Engineering and Energy Systems
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAerospace engineeringFinDynamics (music)Computer scienceAerodynamicsAeronauticsEnvironmental scienceControl theory (sociology)EngineeringPhysicsControl (management)Acoustics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The research described in this paper relates to a platform under development at Quanser Inc. that embodies a novel small airship: the highly-maneuverable almost-lighter-than-air vehicle (ALTAV). Its marginal stability and redundant actuation make the problem of controller design particularly important and challenging. A high-fidelity mathematical model has been developed to accurately represent the behavior of the airship under the effect of winds and other disturbances. The equations of motion have been derived taking into account the effects of added-mass and wind. Hull forces for a 360◦ range of angle of attack have been estimated by adapting an existing semi-empirical method for slender bodies. A simple thruster model developed from experimental data has been shown to provide good agreement with actual thrust measurements under static conditions. Finally, simulation results are presented to highlight the importance of closed-loop control and directions for future work are discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.855
Threshold uncertainty score0.722

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAerospace Engineering and Energy SystemsFrench-language works237,207