All-Ceramic Crown Tooth Preparation and Provisional Crown Fabrication
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract This 30-minute instructional video depicts the step-by-step procedures required for the preparation of a maxillary central incisor for an all-ceramic full coverage restoration and the fabrication of a provisional restoration in a mannequin. The recording is divided into two parts. The first part lasts 19 minutes and outlines the 10 sequential steps involved in an all-ceramic tooth preparation. The second part of the video lasts 11 minutes and is divided into four segments depicting the fabrication of the provisional restoration for the prepared tooth. This resource was developed in response to dental student criticism regarding how difficult it is for them to visually appreciate the live demonstrations taught in simulation clinic since the mannequin's oral cavity is small. They had to take sequential turns during these demonstrations in order to be able to get close enough to their instructor while he or she was performing a particular task. As such, it was rare for each student to be able to watch their instructor perform a given procedure from start-to-finish. While having an inadequate field-of-view is an issue for any dental procedure that students are attempting to learn, it can be a particular hindrance in fixed prosthodontics. Therefore, the creation of an instructional aide that will help to alleviate the issue of a lack of visual access is warranted. Over the past few decades, new technology has been introduced into the dental classroom setting, including the use of instructional video and computer-based simulation. Previous studies on these as preclinical teaching aids have reported favorable results both in terms of student attitudes and learning outcomes. Although instructional videos have been developed in dentistry, none of these have involved the demonstration of an all-ceramic tooth preparation and/or provisional crown fabrication.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.051 | 0.006 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".