MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2332162302 · doi:10.15766/mep_2374-8265.5099

All-Ceramic Crown Tooth Preparation and Provisional Crown Fabrication

2009· article· en· W2332162302 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueMedEdPORTAL · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldDentistry
TopicDental Research and COVID-19
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCrown (dentistry)Fixed prosthodonticsResource (disambiguation)Computer scienceMaxillary central incisorDental laboratoryDentistryOrthodonticsMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract This 30-minute instructional video depicts the step-by-step procedures required for the preparation of a maxillary central incisor for an all-ceramic full coverage restoration and the fabrication of a provisional restoration in a mannequin. The recording is divided into two parts. The first part lasts 19 minutes and outlines the 10 sequential steps involved in an all-ceramic tooth preparation. The second part of the video lasts 11 minutes and is divided into four segments depicting the fabrication of the provisional restoration for the prepared tooth. This resource was developed in response to dental student criticism regarding how difficult it is for them to visually appreciate the live demonstrations taught in simulation clinic since the mannequin's oral cavity is small. They had to take sequential turns during these demonstrations in order to be able to get close enough to their instructor while he or she was performing a particular task. As such, it was rare for each student to be able to watch their instructor perform a given procedure from start-to-finish. While having an inadequate field-of-view is an issue for any dental procedure that students are attempting to learn, it can be a particular hindrance in fixed prosthodontics. Therefore, the creation of an instructional aide that will help to alleviate the issue of a lack of visual access is warranted. Over the past few decades, new technology has been introduced into the dental classroom setting, including the use of instructional video and computer-based simulation. Previous studies on these as preclinical teaching aids have reported favorable results both in terms of student attitudes and learning outcomes. Although instructional videos have been developed in dentistry, none of these have involved the demonstration of an all-ceramic tooth preparation and/or provisional crown fabrication.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.878
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.354
Teacher spread0.328 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it