MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2332167535 · doi:10.5670/oceanog.2015.25

BOOK REVIEW. Double Diffusive Convection

2015· article· en· W2332167535 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueOceanography · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicNanofluid Flow and Heat Transfer
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsConvectionMeteorologyGeologyEnvironmental scienceMechanicsGeographyPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Double-diffusive convection (DDC) is a phenomenon that can occur in fluids in which buoyancy is affected by two constituents that diffuse at different rates. Many readers of Oceanography magazine will be at least somewhat familiar with the topic of oceanic DDC, probably in the form of “salt fingers” (SF), a variety that can arise when surface waters are warmer and more saline than waters below, as is the case in broad reaches of the ocean, especially in the subtropics. A second variety, called the "diffusive layering" (DL) mode, requires that the warmer water lie below the cooler water, a common situation at high latitudes. In addition, both SF and DL can exist at the boundaries between interleaving water masses, a situation that can occur anywhere that lateral gradients of temperature and salinity occur. Thus, many areas of the ocean appear to be susceptible to DDC, and observations suggest that DDC is commonly present in such regions, especially if background turbulence is relatively low. This would be a mere curiosity but for the fact that the divergence of DDC-mediated fluxes may be large enough to have significant effects on the background system.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.408
Threshold uncertainty score0.467

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it