MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2332170459 · doi:10.2514/6.2014-1327

Icephobic Coating Evaluation for Aerospace Application

2014· article· en· W2332170459 on OpenAlexaff
Caroline Laforte, Caroline Blackburn, Jean Perron, Roger J. Aubert

Bibliographic record

Venue55th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicIcing and De-icing Technologies
Canadian institutionsBell Helicopter Textron (Canada)Université du Québec
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDurabilityIcingMaterials scienceCoatingIcing conditionsAdhesionComposite materialCentrifugePolypropyleneErosionEnvironmental scienceGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents an extended study on the properties of icephobic coatings for aerospace applications, more specifically rotorcraft. Ideally, an icephobic material should be the least expensive anti-icing solution, inasmuch as the anti-icing effect is not destroyed by inclement environmental conditions. Several studies on the subject have already been published. Nevertheless, in most cases, only the results of ice adhesion on freshly coated samples are presented and discussed. In this study, the effects of aging (weathering and erosion) and of the number of ice/deicing cycles on coating durability were also considered relative to their possible use on airplanes and helicopters. In the first step, ice adhesion was measured in Centrifuge Adhesion Tests (CAT) on eight promising coatings. The ice adhesion τadh of the candidate coatings was found to vary from 0.001 MPa to 0.16 MPa. In the second step, in order to analyze ice accretion and ice shedding, four favorable coatings were evaluated in a wind tunnel on scaled-down rotor (SRB) set-ups, which were iced and rotated until shedding occurred. Regarding the environmental aspect, the durability of the utmost ice adhesion reducer coatings was evaluated under rain and sand erosion, as well as multiple icing/deicing exposures.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue55th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials ConferenceSame topicIcing and De-icing TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207