MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2332177781 · doi:10.3130/aijs.79.761

EFFECT OF LATERAL AND ROTATIONAL RESTRAINT FOR BRACINGS ON LATERAL BUCKLING LOAD FOR H-SHAPED BEAMS UNDER MOMENT GRADIENT

2014· article· en· W2332177781 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Structural and Construction Engineering (Transactions of AIJ) · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicStructural Load-Bearing Analysis
Canadian institutionsHatch (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBucklingFlangeStructural engineeringRigidity (electromagnetism)Bending momentMaterials scienceMoment (physics)Beam (structure)Ultimate tensile strengthStructural loadStress (linguistics)Flexural rigidityEngineeringComposite materialPhysicsClassical mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The bending moment of the beam is varied along the member under the dead load and lateral seismic load, and then the stress of the upper flange with the lateral bracings become compressive or tensile. Therefore the lateral bracings connected to flange need to have the lateral and rotational rigidity to prevent the lateral buckling of the beams when the upper flanges have the tensile stress. In this paper, the elastic lateral buckling load of H-shaped beams under moment gradient is developed with the energy method, and the relation between the elastic lateral buckling load and the required rigidity is clarified. Next, the elasto-plastic lateral buckling moment is evaluated using the modified slenderness ratio with the elastic lateral buckling load.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.125
Threshold uncertainty score0.708

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.204
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it