MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2332237314 · doi:10.1071/aseg2006ab097

Field Tests of Geotech’s Airborne AFMAG EM System

2006· article· pt· W2332237314 on OpenAlexaffabout
Bob Lo, Petr Kuzmin, E. L. Morrison

Bibliographic record

VenueASEG Extended Abstracts · 2006
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeophysical and Geoelectrical Methods
Canadian institutionsPetro Geotech (Canada)Thornhill Medical (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTest siteRange (aeronautics)Remote sensingFixed wingElectrical conductorStructural basinMarine engineeringNoise (video)GeologyMeteorologyEngineeringEnvironmental scienceAerospace engineeringGeographyWingElectrical engineeringMining engineeringComputer scienceGeomorphology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Geotech’s airborne Audio Frequency Magnetics (AFMAG) system was successfully flown in a helicopter towed bird configuration over selected test sites in Sudbury, Canada.Airborne trials were conducted over Vermillion Lake, the Trillabelle deposit, north range of the Sudbury Basin, and over the Reid-Mahaffy test site. The results over Reid-Mahaffy show that exploration sized targets can be detected while the conductors seen in the Sudbury trials show that larger, and regional conductors are detected as well.Research and development is underway to implement the system onto Geotech’s Grand Caravan, although the noise characteristics of a fixed-wing aircraft are challenging.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.059
Threshold uncertainty score0.117

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2006
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueASEG Extended AbstractsSame topicGeophysical and Geoelectrical MethodsFrench-language works237,207