Fixation Stability and Location in Patients With Unilateral Idiopathic Epiretinal Membrane
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: To explore fixation stability of patients with decreased vision due to idiopathic epiretinal membrane. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fourteen consecutive patients with unilateral idiopathic epiretinal membrane participated. Visual acuity was measured with ETDRS, and fixation stability was recorded with the MP-1 microperimeter (Nidek Technologies Srl., Vigonza, Italy) for both eyes. Informed consent was obtained from all participants. RESULTS: Visual acuity of the affected eye (mean = .45 ± .23 LogMAR) was significantly worse than that of the contralateral eye (mean = .11 ± .16 Log-MAR), P < .0001. Fixation stability of the affected eye was not significantly different from that of the contralateral eye. There was a high correlation between fixation stability of the affected and contralateral eyes, r(12) = .67, P = .0087. Moreover, fixation was central or within 3 degrees from the fovea. CONCLUSION: Despite lower visual acuity, untreated eyes with idiopathic epiretinal membrane have unimpaired central fixation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".