MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2332323008 · doi:10.7870/cjcmh-2005-0013

Development of a Seniors' Mental Health Policy Lens: An Analytical Tool to Assess Policies and Programs from a Seniors' Mental Health Perspective

2005· article· en· W2332323008 on OpenAlexafffundvenueabout
Penny MacCourt, Holly Tuokko

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Community Mental Health · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicHealth, psychology, and well-being
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
FundersHealth Canada
KeywordsMental healthPerspective (graphical)Promotion (chess)Health promotionUnintended consequencesPsychologyHealth policyGerontologyMedicineNursingPsychiatryPublic healthPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Seniors Mental Health Policy Lens (SMHPL) is an analytical tool developed to identify unintended negative effects of current and planned policies, programs, and practices on seniors' mental health. It is designed (a) to promote social environments, including health services, supportive of older adults' mental health, and (b) to help ensure that the way mental health services are defined, delivered, and funded will result in increased emphasis on mental health promotion and on the prevention of mental health problems. The SMHPL incorporates Canadian seniors' perspectives on the factors influencing their mental health, and reflects the values of older adults.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.013
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.017
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.064
Threshold uncertainty score0.128

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0130.017
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0180.009
Science and technology studies0.0040.004
Scholarly communication0.0080.007
Open science0.0010.005
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.129
GPT teacher head0.484
Teacher spread0.355 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2005
Admission routes4
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Community Mental HealthSame topicHealth, psychology, and well-beingFrench-language works237,207