MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2332343877 · doi:10.1180/minmag.2013.077.1.07

Cerchiaraite-(Fe) and cerchiaraite-(Al), two new barium cyclosilicate chlorides from Italy and California, USA

2013· article· en· W2332343877 on OpenAlexaff
Anthony R. Kampf, A. C. Roberts, K. E. Venance, Cristina Carbone, Donato Belmonte, G. E. Dunning, Robert E. Walstrom

Bibliographic record

VenueMineralogical Magazine · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicCrystal Structures and Properties
Canadian institutionsGeological Survey of Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologyMohs scale of mineral hardnessOctahedronQuartzMineralogyChloriteGeochemistryCrystallographyArchaeologyChemistryCrystal structurePaleontologyGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The ideal formula for members of the cerchiaraite group is Ba 4 M 4 (Si 4 O 12 )O 2 (OH) 4 C l2 [Si 2 O 3 (OH) 4 ], where M represents Mn 3+ , Fe 3+ or Al in the octahedral site. A suffix-based naming scheme is used in which the original cerchiaraite is renamed cerchiaraite-(Mn) and two new minerals are named cerchiaraite-(Fe) and cerchiaraite-(Al). The type localities for cerchiaraite-(Fe) are the Cerchiara mine, Liguria, Italy and the Esquire No. 7 and No. 8 claims, Big Creek, Fresno County, California, USA. The type localities for cerchiaraite-(Al) are the Esquire No. 1 claim, Rush Creek, Fresno County, California, USA and the Esquire No. 7 and No. 8 claims noted above. At the Cerchiara mine, cerchiaraite-(Fe) occurs in small fractures and veinlets in a Jurassic ophiolitic sequence. It is of secondary hydrothermal origin and occurs as tan to brown thin prisms and matted fibres. Cerchiaraite(Fe) and cerchiaraite-(Al) from the Esquire No. 1, No. 7 and No. 8 claims occur in parallel-bedded quartz-sanbornite vein assemblages which formed as a result of fluid interaction along the margin of the vein. At the Esquire No. 1, No. 7 and No. 8 claims, both cerchiaraite-(Fe) and cerchiaraite-(Al) occur as subparallel aggregates of blue to bluish green irregular prisms. Both minerals are transparent with a vitreous lustre, Mohs hardness ~4½ , brittle tenacity, irregular fracture and no cleavage. The calculated density of cerchiaraite-(Fe) is 3.710 g cm -3 ; the measured density of cerchiaraite-(Al) is 3.69(3) g cm -3 and the calculated density is 3.643 g cm -3 . Cerchiaraite-(Fe) is uniaxial (+), with ω = 1.741(2) and ε = 1.768(2); it is weakly pleochroic and O is colourless and E is yellow. Cerchiaraite-(Al) is uniaxial (-), with ω = 1.695(2) and e = 1.677(2); it is strongly pleochroic and O is colourless and E is blue. Electron-microprobe analyses yielded empirical formulae ranging from (Ba 3.82 Na 0.02 Ca 0.04 ) Σ3.88 (Fe 3+ 3.42 Ti 4+ 0.27 Al 3+ 0.25 Mn 3+ 0.04 Mg 0.02 ) Σ4.00 Si 5.62 O 15.47 (OH) 9.31 Cl 2.22 (Cerchiara mine) to Ba 4.00 (Al 3+ 2.40 Fe 3+ 1.12 Mg 0.15 Fe 2+ 0.12 Mn 2+ 0.06 ) Σ3.85 Si 5.78 O 15.34 (OH) 8.75 Cl 2.91 (Esquire No. 1 claim). Cerchiaraite is tetragonal with Z = 2 and crystallizes in space group I 4/ mmm . The cell parameters for cerchiaraite-(Fe) are a = 14.3554(12), c = 6.0065(5) Å and V = 1237.80(5) Å 3 ; those for cerchiaraite(Al) are a = 14.317(4), c = 6.0037(18) Å and V = 1230.6(6) Å 3 . In the cerchiaraite-(Fe) structure, SiO 4 tetrahedra share corners forming a four-membered Si 4 O 12 ring. The ring is corner-linked to an edgesharing chain of Fe 3+ O 6 octahedra running parallel to c . A Cl site alternates along c with the Si 4 O 12 ring. A large channel in the framework contains Ba atoms around its periphery and statistically distributed Si 2 O 7 silicate dimers and Cl atoms. The strong blue pleochroic colour is attributed to Fe 2+ - Fe 3+ intervalence charge transfer along the octahedral chain.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.023
Threshold uncertainty score0.046

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMineralogical MagazineSame topicCrystal Structures and PropertiesFrench-language works237,207