MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2332346150 · doi:10.16965/ijpr.2014.697

PHYSIOTHERAPY PRACTICES ACROSS DIFFERENT PLACES: A REVIEW OF LITERATURE

2014· review· en· W2332346150 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Mukesh Goyal, Salil Jandyal

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Physiotherapy and Research · 2014
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePhysical therapyPhysical medicine and rehabilitation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The present review study is carried out in order to study various practices in physiotherapy across different places. Physiotherapy is the health care profession primarily concerned with the remediation of impairments and disabilities and the promotion of mobility, functional ability, quality of life and movement potential through examination, evaluation, diagnosis and physical intervention. Physical therapy is a professional career which has many specialties including sports, neurology, woundcare, cardiopulmonary, geriatrics, orthopedic and pediatrics. The study concluded different practices in physiotherapy treatment across various places. Some authors mentioned very clearly the under utilization of physiotherapists in providing rehabilitation services and were of the strong opinion that the physiotherapists should be actively involved as they could play an important role in the implementation of a cost-effective rehabilitation service paradigm. One author examined the origin of physiotherapy and particularly its relation with the nursing. Some authors studied the trends and the desirability of specialization in physiotherapy practice, opportunities for individual practitioners to gain recognition as specialists, and the Scope for achieving greater harmonization of specialist practice and recognition across the EU. Few authors were of the view that as a profession integral to health promotion, prevention, acute care and rehabilitation, physiotherapy plays an essential role in the health care system. Some researchers pointed out the lack of evidence of use of tilt tables by physiotherapists in Intensive Care Units (ICUs) in Australian Hospitals. A group of researchers also threw a light on the practice and research of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) in Canada and few discussed how physiotherapists might respond to the challenges of health care reform which took place in New Zealand some eight to ten years back. A group of authors brought to the limelight a very important observation which stated that the Physiotherapists are known to be prone to Work- related musculoskeletal disorders (WRMDs) but its prevalence among physiotherapists in Nigeria has not been reported.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.857
Threshold uncertainty score0.710

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.087
GPT teacher head0.558
Teacher spread0.471 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Physiotherapy and ResearchSame topicCerebral Palsy and Movement DisordersFrench-language works237,207