MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2332351479 · doi:10.2118/176167-ms

An Efficient and Parallel Scalable Geomechanics Simulator for Reservoir Simulation

2015· article· en· W2332351479 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueAll Days · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Numerical Methods in Computational Mathematics
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCMG Reservoir Simulation FoundationUniversity of Calgary
KeywordsGeomechanicsScalabilityReservoir simulationComputer scienceGridSpeedupCoupling (piping)Computational scienceSimulationParallel computingPetroleum engineeringGeologyEngineeringGeotechnical engineeringMechanical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract A tetrahedron-grid based parallel geomechanics simulator is developed and presented in this paper. Parallel computing is employed to handle large scale problems by benefiting from its features of distributed memory storage and efficient runtime reduction. This simulator aims to describe rock matrix deformation and its interactions with pore fluid. In the consideration of the feasibility in coupling with a variety of existing reservoir simulators, the modularized geomechanics simulator is designed to be a library. Through interfaces provided by the library, conventional reservoir simulators can get geomechanics effects involved. In this paper, the framework of a parallel geomechanics simulator and the strategy for coupling with a reservoir simulator are presented. Iteratively coupling approach is employed to make geomechanics modeling more independent and flexible. The procedure for solving solid mechanism and calculating coupling parameters is general, which can be applied to more complicated constitutive laws and rock property descriptions. A parallel strategy is proposed to improve the computational efficiency of solving the coupled problem. To verify the utility and efficiency of the geomechanics simulator, simulations coupled with a three-phase black oil model are performed. Expected geomechanical phenomena are illustrated by numerical experiments. In addition, for testing the scalability behaviour, field scale problems with millions reservoir and geomechanics grid blocks are performed. We use an increasing number of processors to run the cases, respectively, and the results indicate an encouraging speedup.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.484
Threshold uncertainty score0.414

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.077
GPT teacher head0.358
Teacher spread0.281 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it