Two cases of poisoning by raw taro leaf and how a poison control centre, food safety inspectors, and a specialty supermarket chain found a solution
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Although the taro plant, Colocasia esculenta, is commonly consumed throughout Asia, Africa, the Pacific Islands, and the Caribbean, its consumption is less common in North America. Exposure to raw or improperly prepared taro is associated with oropharyngeal irritation and swelling and, rarely, airway obstruction. Although cases of toxicity in countries where taro is a staple have been reported, cases in North America have not been described. Here, two cases of oral irritation and swelling in BC residents who ate raw taro leaf, were reported to the British Columbia Drug and Poison Information Centre (BC DPIC) and triggered an investigation involving a regional health authority and the Canadian Food Inspection Agency. Investigators found that the vendor, a chain of ethnic supermarkets, offered no point of sale preparation instructions. The vendor responded initially by posting instructional signage and later by voluntary product withdrawal. Analysis of BC DPIC records between 1 November 2011 and 20 December 2013 identified 11 cases of symptomatic taro exposure, five to the leaf and six to the corm. The two index cases and subsequent investigation illustrate how new foods or foods in unfamiliar contexts may present as calls to a poison control centre and that prevention requires collaboration among public and corporate stakeholders.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it