MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2332402362 · doi:10.3917/hes.161.0058

La société civile organisée et l’impératif participatif. Ambivalences et concurrence

2016· article· fr· W2332402362 on OpenAlexaff
Sandrine Rui

Bibliographic record

VenueHistoire économie et société · 2016
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicFrench Urban and Social Studies
Canadian institutionsInstitute of Particle Physics
Fundersnot available
KeywordsConcurrencePolitical scienceHumanitiesPhilosophyPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Alors que, historiquement, leur rôle dans le modèle politique français a été progressivement réévalué, les acteurs de la société civile organisée affrontent avec scepticisme les développements contemporains de la démocratie participative. Mis en concurrence dans leur propre capacité autonome à investir et structurer l’espace public, ils doivent aussi compter avec un régime normatif contraignant qui altère leur capacité d’action et leur légitimité. Pourtant, la contribution des corps intermédiaires aux dispositifs participatifs s’avère non seulement décisive pour la qualité délibérative, mais elle est aussi une source de régénération dans un contexte où ils n’échappent pas eux-mêmes à la défiance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.778
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.007
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.057
GPT teacher head0.324
Teacher spread0.267 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHistoire économie et sociétéSame topicFrench Urban and Social StudiesFrench-language works237,207