MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2332404979 · doi:10.1021/ma200454e

Improved Measures for the Shape of a Disordered Polymer To Test a Mean-Field Theory of Collapse

2011· article· en· W2332404979 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueMacromolecules · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicTheoretical and Computational Physics
Canadian institutionsLakehead UniversityUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRadius of gyrationGyrationEllipsoidPrincipal axis theoremGeometryCuboidExcluded volumeTensor (intrinsic definition)Volume (thermodynamics)PolymerStatistical physicsMathematicsPhysicsThermodynamicsNuclear magnetic resonance

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We have generated off-lattice self-avoiding random walks (SAWs) by both Lal’s pivot algorithm and by discontinuous molecular dynamics (DMD) simulations. We chose several volume measures to analyze and compare the shapes characterizing ensembles of SAWs. These included the Flory volume defined through the end-to-end distance, the volume corresponding to the radius of gyration of the polymer, the volume of a sphere drawn from the center of polymer mass that encloses or embeds all the monomers in the polymer, the corresponding ellipsoid describing the radius of gyration tensor, the volume of the smallest Cartesian box oriented in a fixed “lab” frame which encloses all polymer monomers, and the volume of the smallest box oriented along the principal axes of the radius of gyration tensor that encloses all polymer monomers. The tensor ellipsoid and principal box correlate well with each other but not with the other measures. There is a substantial amount of polymer that is excluded from the radius of gyration sphere or ellipsoid (approximately 42% and 44% respectively on average), which casts doubt on the utility of these measures in quantitatively characterizing the volume spanned by a polymer configuration. The principal box volume led to the most well-defined length distribution for the SAW in terms of the ratio of standard deviation to the mean, while the end-to-end distribution was the most broadly distributed. In the principal box analysis, polymer configurations are highly anisotropic, with stronger cubic to square prism symmetry breaking than square prism to rectangular cuboid. We introduce the acubicity in analogy with the asphericity and find its distribution, along with a generalization of acubicity that better discriminates polymer anisotropy. We analyze the role of the above volume measures in determining the packing fraction which enters into the “random mixing” mean-field theory for the energy of an isolated homopolymer. Here we find from both pivot and DMD simulations that no particular volume measure reproduces the mean-field scaling exponent (of unity) for the energy as a function of the reciprocal polymer volume. Instead, anomalous exponents are observed which are less than that of mean-field theory, ranging from 0.2 to 0.5 depending on the contact cutoff length. An energy function with such an anomalous scaling may be used in a simple phenomenological theory of coil–globule collapse. We find in particular that the Flory volume does not accurately describe the energy in a mean-field theory. Possible reasons for such anomalous exponents are discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.482
Threshold uncertainty score0.246

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it