MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2332405477 · doi:10.1524/ract.2011.1802

An integrated study of uranyl mineral dissolution processes: etch pit formation, effects of cations in solution, and secondary precipitation

2011· article· en· W2332405477 on OpenAlex
Michael Schindler, F. C. Hawthorne, Peter Mandaliev, Peter C. Burns, Patricia A. Maurice

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueRadiochimica Acta · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicRadioactive element chemistry and processing
Canadian institutionsUniversity of ManitobaLaurentian University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaUniversity of ManitobaUniversity of Notre DameNational Science Foundation
KeywordsUranylChemistryDissolutionAqueous solutionUraniumPrecipitationNuclear chemistrySolubilityInorganic chemistryAnalytical Chemistry (journal)CrystallographyPhysical chemistryIon

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Understanding the mechanism(s) of uranium-mineral dissolution is crucial for predictive modeling of U mobility in the subsurface. In order to understand how pH and type of cation in solution may affect dissolution, experiments were performed on mainly single crystals of curite, Pb 2+ 3 (H 2 O) 2 [(UO 2 ) 4 O 4 (OH) 3 ] 2 , becquerelite, Ca(H 2 O) 8 [(UO 2 ) 6 O 4 (OH) 6 ], billietite, Ba(H 2 O) 7 [(UO 2 ) 6 O 4 (OH) 6 ], fourmarierite Pb 2+ 1−x (H 2 O) 4 [(UO 2 ) 4 O 3−2x (OH) 4+2x ] ( x = 0.00–0.50), uranophane, Ca(H 2 O) 5 [(UO 2 )(SiO 3 OH)] 2 , zippeite, K 3 (H 2 O) 3 [(UO 2 ) 4 (SO 4 ) 2 O 3 (OH)], and Na-substituted metaschoepite, Na 1−x [(UO 2 ) 4 O 2−x (OH) 5+x ] (H 2 O) n . Solutions included: deionized water; aqueous HCl solutions at pH 3.5 and 2; 0.5 mol L −1 Pb(II)-, Ba-, Sr-, Ca-, Mg-, HCl solutions at pH 2; 1.0 mol L −1 Na- and K-HCl solutions at pH 2; and a 0.1 mol L −1 Na 2 CO 3 solution at pH 10.5. Uranyl mineral basal surface microtopography, micromorphology, and composition were examined prior to, and after dissolution experiments on micrometer scale specimens using atomic force microscopy, scanning electron microscopy, and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy. Evolution of etch pit depth at different pH values and experimental durations can be explained using a stepwave dissolution model. Effects of the cation in solution on etch pit symmetry and morphology can be explained using an adsorption model involving specific surface sites. Surface precipitation of the following phases was observed: (a) a highly-hydrated uranyl-hydroxy-hydrate in ultrapure water (on all minerals), (b) a Na-uranyl-hydroxy-hydrate in Na 2 CO 3 solution of pH 10.5 (on uranyl-hydroxy-hydrate minerals), (c) a Na-uranyl-carbonate on zippeite, (d) Ba- and Pb-uranyl-hydroxy-hydrates in Ba-HCl and Pb-HCl solutions of pH 2 (on uranophane), (e) a (SiO x (OH) 4−2x ) phase in solutions of pH 2 (uranophane), and (f) sulfate-bearing phases in solutions of pH 2 and 3.5 (on zippeite).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.034
Threshold uncertainty score0.632

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it