Diaphragm defects occur in a CDH hernia model independently of myogenesis and lung formation
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) is a significant clinical problem in which a portion of the diaphragmatic musculature fails to form, resulting in a hole in the diaphragm. Here we use animal models of CDH to test two hypotheses regarding the pathogenesis. First, the origin of the defect results from the malformation of the amuscular mesenchymal component of the primordial diaphragm rather than with the process of myogenesis. Second, the defect in the primordial diaphragmatic tissue is not secondary to defects in the developing lung. In c-met(-/-) mouse embryos, in which diaphragm muscle fibers do not form because of a defect in muscle precursor migration, the amuscular substratum forms fully. We show that a defect characteristic of CDH can be induced in the amuscular membrane. In Fgf10(-/-) mouse embryos that have lung agenesis we show that the primordial diaphragm does not depend on signals from lung tissue for proper development and that diaphragmatic malformation is a primary defect in CDH. These data suggest that the pathogenesis of CDH involves mechanisms fundamentally different from previously proposed hypotheses.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it