ANALYSIS OF CLINICAL MANIFESTATIONS AND ENDOCRINOLOGICAL ASPECTS OF PATIENTS HAVING PADAM-LIKE SYMPTOMS
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PURPOSE: To analyze clinical manifestations and endocrinological aspects of the patients who visited our hospital to be examined for partial androgen deficiency in the aging male (PADAM). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two hundred forty-three patients were evaluated. History taking and questionnaires were employed for analysis of their symptoms. Serum total testosterone (T), free-T and other hormones were measured for evaluation of the androgen deficiency. RESULTS: The chief complains of the patients were categorized as psychological symptoms, somatovegatative symptoms, and sexual symptoms, accounting for 51%, 36%, and 13%, respectively. A depressed mood, hot flashes and sweating and erectile dysfunction were dominant in these symptom categories, respectively. The prevalence of the psychological symptoms and somatovegatative symptoms was relatively high in the 30-50-year-old and 60-70-year-old groups, respectively. The free-T, but not total-T, was significantly decreased with aging as measured by the RIA method. Twenty one percent of the patients showed a lower total-T level than the normal range (2.7-10.7 ng/ml). The percentage of those with a total-T level lower than 2.0 ng/dl, which is the criterion for T-replacement recommended by the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists guidelines, was 9%. Eighty two percent and 30% of the patients had lower free-T levels than the normal range (15.2-43.5 pg/ml) and that of men in their twenties in the Canadian data (9.3-26.5 pg/ml). Depending on the criteria of androgen deficiency, not all patients had low total-T and free-T levels. CONCLUSION: Patients suspected of having PADAM present various clinical symptoms and endocrinological aspects.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".