MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2332632790 · doi:10.5260/chara.12.4.50

Teen Health and Wellness

2011· article· en· W2332632790 on OpenAlex
Paula Busey

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Charleston Advisor · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicSchool Health and Nursing Education
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The latest release of Rosen Publishing's Teen Health and Wellness database has retained the richness of award-winning content while adding features, new articles, and Web resources that will further increase its appeal, accessibility, and effectiveness for teens. The addition of video clips, health and personal finance calculators, and the ability for teens to submit personal stories and video segments make this product even stronger for teens of all literacy levels. While Teen Health and Wellness is highly valued and acclaimed in public libraries, the database offers much to educators with inclusion of lesson plans, curriculum correlations, opportunities for students to publish, and widgets that allow librarians to highlight this tool on the library or health teachers’ Web pages. The database interface and content are well targeted to a teen audience, and equally easy to use whether for academic or personal information needs. Teen Health and Wellness is in wide release in the United States, and a version customized to schools, colleges, and public libraries of Ontario, Canada has been in use for the last 3 years. The database will continue to be customized to work well with young people in other countries in the next several months. This product remains the best of its kind as an outstanding resource to serve the difficult problems many teens face, and a powerful tool in helping students develop essential twenty-first century knowledge such as communication, information literacy, personal responsibility, and especially problem solving skills.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.456
Threshold uncertainty score0.887

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.139
GPT teacher head0.424
Teacher spread0.285 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it