MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2332653571 · doi:10.1021/ie500214e

Manufacturing Process for in Situ Reaction-Bonded Porous SiC Ceramics Using a Combination of Graft Polymerization and Sol–Gel Approaches

2014· article· en· W2332653571 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIndustrial & Engineering Chemistry Research · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicAdvanced ceramic materials synthesis
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMaterials scienceMulliteSinteringPorosityCeramicComposite materialPolymerizationMicrostructureGreen bodySol-gelFlexural strengthChemical engineeringPolymerNanotechnology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A novel process was successfully developed to manufacture mullite-bonded porous SiC ceramics. In this technique, SiC particles were coated with a sintering additive (alumina) and pore former (high density polyethylene) in a two-step process composed of sol–gel and in situ polymerization techniques, respectively. After the formation of a green body, the porous samples were produced by pressureless sintering under air. The microstructures, phase components, and physical and mechanical properties of the developed porous ceramics were examined and compared with materials obtained by the traditional process. The results interpretation revealed that the flexural strength (35%) and porosity (8%), as well as the pore size of the samples fabricated by the novel process significantly increased as compared to regular ceramic parts. Further characterization indicated that the enhanced properties of the porous ceramics came from the good dispersion of the sintering additive and pore former into the SiC particles and from the higher mullite formation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.761

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.110
GPT teacher head0.323
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it