Mcalpineite from the Gambatesa mine, Italy, and redefinition of the species
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Mcalpineite has been found in the Gambatesa mine (eastern Liguria, Italy). It occurs in a quartz vein mainly as yellowish green earthy crusts consisting of poorly crystallized mcalpineite intergrown with an unidentified Cu-Te phase, as well as quite pure aggregates of well euhedral emerald green crystals (individually reaching up to 50 μm), associated with black fragments of paratellurite (TeO 2 ) and weissite (Cu 2-x Te). The chemical formula of this rare mineral, found at the McAlpine mine (typelocality; California, U.S.A.) and at the Centennial Eureka mine (Utah, U.S.A., co-type locality), was originally given Cu 3 TeO 6 ·H 2 O. X‑ray powder diffraction and selected-area electron diffraction data of mcalpineite are in good agreement with those of synthetic Cu 3 TeO 6 . In addition no evidence for structural OH group was detected by micro-Raman analysis carried out on samples from Gambatesa, Centennial Eureka, and McAlpine (co-type sample) mines. Taking into account structural, topological, and experimental evidence, the crystal structure and chemical composition of mcalpineite must be revised: the mineral crystallizes in the Ia3̄ space group and the correct chemical formula is Cu 3 TeO 6 .
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".