Atomic Property Weighted Radial Distribution Functions Descriptors of Metal–Organic Frameworks for the Prediction of Gas Uptake Capacity
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Metal–organic frameworks (MOFs) are porous materials with exceptional host–guest properties with huge potential for gas separation. The combinatorial design of MOFs demands the in silico screening of the nearly infinite combinations of structural building blocks using efficient computational tools. We report here a novel atomic property weighted radial distribution function (AP-RDF) descriptor tailored for large-scale Quantitative Structure–Property Relationship (QSPR) predictions of gas adsorption of MOFs. A total of ∼58,000 hypothetical MOF structures were used to calibrate correlation models of the methane, N 2, and CO 2 uptake capacities from grand-canonical Monte Carlo (GCMC) simulations. The principal component analysis (PCA) transform of the AP-RDF descriptors exhibited good discrimination of MOF inorganic SBUs, geometrical properties, and more surprisingly gas uptake capacities. While the simulated uptake capacities correlated poorly to the void fraction, surface area, and pore size, the newly introduced AP-RDF scores yielded outstanding QSPR predictions for an external test set of ∼25,000 MOFs with R 2 values in the range from 0.70 to 0.82. The accuracy of the predictions decreased at low pressures, mainly for MOFs with V 2 O 2 or Zr 6 O 8 inorganic structural building units (SBUs) and organic SBUs with fluorine substituents. The QSPR models can serve as efficient filtering tools to detecting promising high-performing candidates at the early stage of virtual high-throughput screening of novel porous materials. The predictive models of the gas uptake capacities of MOFs are available online via our MOF informatics analysis (MOFIA) tool.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".