Reduced conduction reserve in the diabetic rat heart: role of iPLA<sub>2</sub>activation in the response to ischemia
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Hearts from streptozotocin (STZ)-induced diabetic rats have previously been shown to have impaired intercellular electrical coupling, due to reorganization (lateralization) of connexin43 proteins. Due to the resulting reduction in conduction reserve, conduction velocity in diabetic hearts is more sensitive to conditions that reduce cellular excitability or intercellular electrical coupling. Diabetes is a known risk factor for cardiac ischemia, a condition associated with both reduced cellular excitability and reduced intercellular coupling. Activation of Ca(2+)-independent phospholipase A(2) (iPLA(2)) is known to be part of the response to acute ischemia and may contribute to the intercellular uncoupling by causing increased levels of arachidonic acid and lysophosphatidyl choline. Normally perfused diabetic hearts are known to exhibit increased iPLA(2) activity and may thus be particularly sensitive to further activation of these enzymes. In this study, we used voltage-sensitive dye mapping to assess changes in conduction velocity in response to acute global ischemia in Langendorff-perfused STZ-induced diabetic hearts. Conduction slowing in response to ischemia was significantly larger in STZ-induced diabetic hearts compared with healthy controls. Similarly, slowing of conduction velocity in response to acidosis was also more pronounced in STZ-induced diabetic hearts. Inhibition of iPLA(2) activity using bromoenol lactone (BEL; 10 μM) had no effect on the response to ischemia in healthy control hearts. However, in STZ-induced diabetic hearts, BEL significantly reduced the amount of conduction slowing observed beginning 5 min after the onset of ischemia. BEL treatment also significantly increased the time to onset of sustained arrhythmias in STZ-induced diabetic hearts but had no effect on the time to arrhythmia in healthy control hearts. Thus, our results suggest that iPLA(2) activation in response to acute ischemia in STZ-induced diabetic hearts is more pronounced than in control hearts and that this response is a significant contributor to arrhythmogenic conduction slowing.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".