MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2332711774 · doi:10.1158/1538-7445.am2011-4732

Abstract 4732: Cis-expression QTL analysis of established risk variants for colorectal cancer

2011· article· en· W2332711774 on OpenAlexaff
Lenora W. M. Loo, Iona Cheng, Maarit Tiirikainen, Annette Lum‐Jones, Ann Seifried, Lucas M. Dunklee, Steve Gallinger, Stephen N. Thibodeau, Graham Casey, Loı̈c Le Marchand

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGenetic factors in colorectal cancer
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoMount Sinai Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologyColorectal cancerGeneticsExpression quantitative trait lociGeneSNP arrayDNA methylationSingle-nucleotide polymorphismDNA microarrayQuantitative trait locusSNPCancerGenotypeGene expression

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Introduction: Genome-wide association studies of colorectal cancer have identified 18 risk variants that explain ∼25% of the hereditable risk of colorectal cancer. These variants are located in intronic, inter-genic or gene-desert regions. To uncover whether some of these variants may have a regulatory function on the expression of near-by genes, we conducted expression quantitative trait loci (eQTL) analyses of these 18 regions. Methods: DNA and RNA were extracted from 40 fresh-frozen paired colon tumor (microsatellite stable and CpG island methylator phenotype-negative) and adjacent normal tissue samples collected by the Colon Cancer Family Registry. Whole genome gene expression assessment was performed in the tumors and adjacent normal tissue with the Affymetrix GeneChip Human Exon 1.0 ST array. Genome-wide SNP data was generated with DNA extracted from the same normal tissue samples using the Affymetrix Genome-Wide Human SNP 6.0 array. Partek software was used to compare the expression levels by genotype for each gene spanning a 2 Mb region up- and down- stream of each of the 18 established risk variants for colorectal cancer. Results: Three of the 18 risk variants (rs10795668, rs4444235, rs9929218) demonstrated significant cis-eQTLs (FDR q-values<0.05). Specifically, differential gene expression was observed in genes neighboring rs10795668 at 10p14 (ATP5C1, q=0.024), rs4444235 at 14q22.2 (DLGAP5, q=0.041), and rs9929218 at 16q22.1 (NOL3, q=0.017; DDX28, q=0.046). In particular, DLGAP5 (discs, large (Drosophila) homolog-associated protein 5) at 14q22.2 and NOL3 (nucleolar protein 3) at 16q22 are interesting candidate genes for colorectal cancer. DLGAP5 encodes for a microtubule-associated protein and functions as a mitotic regulator that has been reported to be overexpressed in colon tumors. NOL3 (nucleolar protein 3) encodes for an anti-apoptotic protein that down-regulates the expression of caspase 2 and 8, and p53. NOL3 also appears to be overexpressed in colorectal tumors. Conclusion: In summary, these findings suggest putative functional activities for three established colorectal risk variants and highlight potentially interesting candidate genes for this malignancy. If confirmed, these results may help explain the total genetic risk of the disease, as well as further our understanding of the underlying biology of colorectal cancer. Citation Format: {Authors}. {Abstract title} [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 102nd Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2011 Apr 2-6; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2011;71(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 4732. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2011-4732

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.017

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.123
GPT teacher head0.421
Teacher spread0.298 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer Research→Same topicGenetic factors in colorectal cancer→French-language works237,207→